公共服务动机如何影响工作绩效:促进还是干扰?——来自元分析的证据

doi:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.04.007

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 47-56.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.04.007

公共服务动机如何影响工作绩效:促进还是干扰?——来自元分析的证据

张平，刘伟民

(东北大学文法学院，辽宁沈阳110169)

收稿日期:2019-12-27 修回日期:2019-12-27 出版日期:2020-07-25 发布日期:2020-07-29
通讯作者: 张平
作者简介:张平(1969-)，女，辽宁辽阳人，东北大学教授，博士生导师，主要从事政治心理学、社区治理研究;刘伟民(1989-)，男，黑龙江绥化人，东北大学博士研究生，主要从事公共服务、社区治理研究。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助项目(15BZZ067)。

How Does Public Service Motivation Affect Job Performance: Promotion or Interference?——The Evidence from Meta-analysis

ZHANG Ping， LIU Wei-min

(School of Humanities & Law， Northeastern University， Shenyang 110169， China)

Received:2019-12-27 Revised:2019-12-27 Online:2020-07-25 Published:2020-07-29
Contact: -
About author:-
Supported by:
-

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以往公共服务动机与工作绩效关系的研究在关系强度、作用方向以及显著性水平上存在较大分歧。为澄清困顿，采用元分析方法对35篇相关中英文文献进行整理再分析。研究发现:公共服务动机与工作绩效存在中等程度的正相关;文化背景、绩效评价标准和研究设计能够显著调节二者之间的关系，但PSM测量工具的调节效应不显著。元分析结果表明:公共服务动机是促进个体工作绩效的有效内驱力，未来应从扩展元分析技术，探究其中的中介机制，挖掘新的调节变量，探索潜在的边界条件，把握维度匹配规律，寻找绩效提升最优解等角度揭示动机—绩效关系的深层次机理。

关键词: 公共服务动机, 工作绩效, 元分析, 调节效应

Abstract: Previous studies on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance differ greatly in the relationship strength， direction of action and significance level. To clarify difficulties， the meta-analysis method is used to sort and analyze 35 related Chinese and English literatures. The study finds that there is a moderate positive correlation between public service motivation and job performance. Cultural background， performance evaluation criteria and research design can significantly regulate the relationship between public service motivation and job performance， but the adjustment effect of PSM measurement tools is not significant. The meta-analysis results show that public service motivation is an effective driving force to promote work performance. In the future， we should explore the intermediary mechanism from the perspective of extended meta-analysis technology. We should explore new adjustment variables and potential boundary conditions， grasp the dimension matching law， and find the optimal solution for performance improvement to reveal the deep-level mechanism of the motivation-performance relationship.

Key words: public service motivation, job performance, meta-analysis, moderating effect

中图分类号:

D035

张平，刘伟民. 公共服务动机如何影响工作绩效:促进还是干扰?——来自元分析的证据[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(4): 47-56.

ZHANG Ping， LIU Wei-min. How Does Public Service Motivation Affect Job Performance: Promotion or Interference?——The Evidence from Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 2020, 22(4): 47-56.

参考文献

[1]Perry J L，Wise L R. The Motivational Bases of Public Service［J］. Public Administration Review， 1990，50(3):367-373.
[2]Rainey H G，Steinbauer P. Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations［J］. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory， 1999，9(1):1-32.
[3]Scott P G，Pandey S K. Red Tape and Public Service Motivation: Findings from a National Survey of Managers in State Health and Human Services Agencies［J］. Review of Public Personnel Administration， 2005，25(2):155-180.
[4]Bright L. Does Public Service Motivation Really Make a Difference on the Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions of Public Employees?［J］. American Review of Public Administration， 2008，38(2):149-166.
[5]Anderfuhren-Biget S，Varone F，Giauque D，et al. Motivating Employees of the Public Sector: Does Public Service Motivation Matter?［J］. International Public Management Journal， 2010，13(3):213-246.
[6]Kim S. Public Service Motivation and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Korea［J］. International Journal of Manpower， 2006，27(8):722-740.
[7]Steijn B. Person-environment Fit and Public Service Motivation［J］. International Public Management Journal， 2008，11(1):13-27.
[8]Perry J L. Measuring Public Service Motivation:An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity［J］. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory， 1996，6(1):5-22.
[9]Coursey D H，Pandey S K. Public Service Motivation Measurement: Testing an Abridged Version of Perry's Proposed Scale［J］. Administration & Society， 2007，39(5):547-568.
[10]Kim S，Vandenabeele W，Wright B E，et al. Investigating the Structure and Meaning of Public Service Motivation Across Populations: Developing an International Instrument and Addressing Issues of Measurement Invariance［J］. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory， 2012，22(1):79-102.
[11]Vandenabeele W. Development of a Public Service Motivation Measurement Scale: Corroborating and Extending Perry's Measurement Instrument［J］. International Public Management Journal， 2008，11(1):143-167.
[12]Naff K C，Crum J. Working for America:Does Public Service Motivation Make a Difference?［J］. Personnel Administration， 1999，19(4):5-17.
[13]Vandenabeele W. The Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Self-reported Performance: More Robust Evidence of the PSM-performance Relationship［J］. International Review of Administrative Sciences， 2009，75(1):11-34.
[14]Andersen L B，Heinesen E，Pedersen L H. Howdoes Public Service Motivation Among Teachers Affect Student Performance in Schools?［J］. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory， 2014，24(3):651-671.
[15]Bellé N. Experimental Evidence onthe Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and Job Performance［J］. Public Administration Review， 2013，73(1):143-153.
[16]Alonso P，Lewis G B. Public Service Motivation and Job Performance: Evidence from the Federal Sector［J］. American Review of Public Administration， 2001，31(4):363-380.
[17]van Loon N，Kjeldsen A M，Andersen L B，et al. Only When the Societal Impact Potential Is High? A Panel Study of the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and Perceived Performance［J］. Review of Public Personnel Administration， 2016，38(2):139-166.
[18]Bright L. Does Person-organization Fit Mediate the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and the Job Performance of Public Employees?［J］. Review of Public Personnel Administration， 2007，27(4):361-379.
[19]van Loon N，Vandenabeele W，Leisink P. Clarifying the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and In-role and Extra-role Behaviors: The Relative Contributions of Person-job and Person-organization Fit［J］. The American Review of Public Administration， 2015，47(6):699-713.
[20]Leisink P L M，Steijn B. Public Service Motivation and Job Performance of Public Sector Employees in the Netherlands［J］. International Review of Administrative Sciences， 2009，75(1):35-52.
[21]Liu Bangcheng，Tang Ningyu，Zhu Xiaomei. Public Service Motivation and Job Satisfaction in China: An Investigation of Generalisability and Instrumentality［J］. International Journal of Manpower， 2008，29(8):684-699.
[22]李明. 公共服务动机的扩展研究［D］. 南京: 南京师范大学， 2011.
[23]吕鸿江，韩承轩，王道金. 领导者情绪智力对领导力效能影响的元分析［J］. 心理科学进展， 2018(2):204-220.
[24]Hofstede G. The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories［J］. Journal of International Business Studies， 1983，14(2):75-89.
[25]张亚利，李森，俞国良. 自尊与社交焦虑的关系:基于中国学生群体的元分析［J］. 心理科学进展， 2019(6):1005-1018.
[26]张骁，胡丽娜. 创业导向对企业绩效影响关系的边界条件研究——基于元分析技术的探索［J］. 管理世界， 2013(6):99-110.
[27]Hunter J E，Schmidt F L. Dichotomization of Continuous Variables: The Implications for Meta-analysis［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology， 1990，75(3):334-349.
[28]Geyskens I，Steenkamp J B E M，Kumar N. Generalizations About Trust in Marketing Channel Relationships Using Meta-analysis［J］. International Journal of Research in Marketing， 1998，15(3):223-248.
[29]Lipsey M W，Wilson D B. Practical Meta-analysis［M］. Santa Clara: Sage， 2001:24-27.
[30]Rosenthal R. The File Drawer Problem and Tolerance for Null Results［J］. Psychological Bulletin， 1979，86(3):638-641.［31］Kristof-Brown A L，Zimmermann R D，Johnson E C. Consequences of Individuals' Fit at Work: A Meta-analysis of Person-job， Person-organization， Person-group， and Person-supervisor Fit［J］. Personnel Psychology， 2005，58(2):281-342.［32］Edwards J R，Cable D M，Williamson I O，et al. The Phenomenology of Fit: Linking the Person and Environment to the Subjective Experience of Person-environment Fit［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology， 2006，91(4):802-827.［33］张利斌，张鹏程，王豪. 关系嵌入、结构嵌入与知识整合效能:人-环境匹配视角的分析框架［J］. 科学学与科学技术管理， 2012(5):78-83.［34］刘晓洋. 公共服务动机绩效促进模型与检验［J］. 学术研究， 2017(5):62-68.［35］李小华，董军. 公务员公共服务动机对个体绩效的影响研究［J］. 公共行政评论， 2012(1):105-121.［36］Raffaela P. Public Service Motivation and Employee Outcomes in the Italian Public Sector: Testing the Mediating Effect of Person-organization Fit［J］. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods， 2016，11(2):1-17.［37］陈光潮，邵红梅. 波特-劳勒综合激励模型及其改进［J］. 学术研究， 2004(12):41-46.［38］Wright B E，Christensen R K，Pandey S K. Measuring Public Service Motivation: Exploring the Equivalence of Existing Global Measures［J］. International Public Management Journal， 2013，16(2):197-223.［39］Brewer G A，Maranto R A. Comparing the Roles of Political Appointees and Career Executives in the U.S. Federal Executive Branch［J］. American Review of Public Administration， 2000，30(1):69-86.［40］McCracken M J， Mcllwain T F，Fottler M D. Measuring Organizational Performance in the Hospital Industry: An Exploratory Comparison of Objective and Subjective Methods［J］. Health Services Management Research， 2001，14(4):211-219.［41］Wright B E，Hassan S，Christensen R K. Job Choice and Performance: Revisiting Core Assumptions About Public Service Motivation［J］. International Public Management Journal， 2015，20(1):1-24.

公共服务动机如何影响工作绩效:促进还是干扰?——来自元分析的证据

How Does Public Service Motivation Affect Job Performance: Promotion or Interference?——The Evidence from Meta-analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郭禹辰，戴淑媛. 政策网络视角下城市基层社区治理的结构性困境——基于上海市A街道微更新的实证研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(4): 57-65.
[2]	荣震，柏维春. 体制变迁视角下我国腐败治理的内在逻辑与战略取向[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(4): 66-72.
[3]	高登晖，魏淑艳. 环保督察背景下我国省级政府生态环境治理的结构要素与作用机理分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(4): 73-81.
[4]	王法硕，丁海恩. 官方媒体使用如何影响制度自信?——爱国主义的中介作用与政治知识的调节作用[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 47-55.
[5]	李月，曹海军. 数据生命周期视角下政府跨域协作数据治理及其运行逻辑[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 56-63.
[6]	王颖，王梦. 间断均衡理论视域下我国环保政策变迁研究——基于改革开放以来的政策文本分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(3): 64-72.
[7]	王刚，徐雅倩. 公众风险感知的影响因素:一个利益与信息的双维审视——来自L市的实证分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 22(1): 73-80.
[8]	李姚姚，彭宗超. 场域变迁视角下的地方治理创新研究——基于H区预算听证创新的案例分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(6): 591-598.
[9]	陈通，夏红梅，侯光辉. 合作平台、控制权共享和公共数字文化服务提供——以嘉兴市“文化有约”为例[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(6): 599-606.
[10]	韩啸，吴金鹏. 政府信息公开制度扩散的多重逻辑——面向中国省份的事件史分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(5): 489-496.
[11]	司晓悦，赵霞霞. 国内整体性治理研究的知识图谱——基于2008—2018年CSSCI及核心期刊来源的文献计量分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(4): 367-373.
[12]	孙宗锋，赵文博，李进涛. 接触对警察绩效评价的影响:腐败感知的中介效应[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(4): 373-380.
[13]	胡春艳，刘丽蓉. 环境污染事件中官员问责的结果差异研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(3): 275-282.
[14]	郑美玲，魏淑艳. 我国政府治理中的政策转移失灵研究——基于股市“熔断机制”政策转移分析[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(3): 283-290.
[15]	包国宪，关斌. 公民集体偏好会影响地方政府公共支出结构吗——基于公共价值理论的实证研究[J]. 东北大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 21(2): 156-164.