东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 64-71.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2022.04.008

• 政治与公共管理研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

政策势差:基层政策执行难的一个分析视角——基于A区学位分配争议的考察

李慧龙1,尉馨元2   

  1. (1.华南理工大学公共管理学院,广东广州510641;2.中共广东省委党校(广东行政学院)应急管理教研部,广东广州510053)
  • 修回日期:2021-03-08 接受日期:2021-03-08 发布日期:2022-08-29
  • 通讯作者: 李慧龙
  • 作者简介:李慧龙(1989-),男,河南襄城人,华南理工大学助理研究员,博士后研究人员,主要从事公共政策与数字治理研究;尉馨元(1988-),女,山东莱阳人,中共广东省委党校(广东行政学院)副教授,管理学博士,主要从事公共政策与应急管理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年资助项目(20CZZ042)。

An Analytical Perspective from Policy Gap to Understanding the Difficulty of Implementing Policies at the Grassroots Level: An Investigation Based on the Disputes Over School Places Allocation in A District

LI Huilong1, WEI Xinyuan2   

  1. (1. School of Public Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China; 2. Department of Emergency Management, Party School of Guangdong Provincial Committee of CPC (Guangdong Institute of Public Administration), Guangzhou 510053, China)
  • Revised:2021-03-08 Accepted:2021-03-08 Published:2022-08-29
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 对基层政策执行难的解释多关注单阶段因素或其叠加影响,而弱化了跨阶段融合性分析。以A区学位分配为研究案例,基于田野观察与深度访谈分析,可以发现基层政策执行难的背后,存在上层政策目标向基层“下沉”与“内嵌”两个阶段间的政策势差因素,具体呈现为刚性下沉—弹性嵌入的条块势差、整体下沉—分步嵌入的远近势差、普适下沉—区别嵌入的点面势差,三者分别加剧了基层政策执行中的权衡性、过渡性与局部性难题。政策势差是“高位制定、低位执行”政策结构与“决策删简、执行协商”政策过程共同塑造的结果,是自上而下官僚体制逻辑与由内而外社会情境逻辑衔接中的时空间隙。政策势差情境下的基层政策执行应警惕完美主义与系统性低效两个误区,采取最大限度缩减和渐进调适的积极因应策略。

关键词: 政策执行; 政策势差; 条块关系; 教育资源; 学位分配

Abstract: Explanations of the difficulty in implementing policies at the grassroots level have focused more on single-stage factors or their superimposed effects, and thus weakened cross-stage integration analysis. Based on field observations and in-depth interview analysis, it can be found that behind the difficulty in implementing policies at the grassroots level, there is a policy gap factor between the “down-embedding” of the upper-level policy objectives to the grassroots level, which is specifically represented as a strip-piece gap between rigid-down and flexible embedding, far-near gap between overall-down and step-by-step embedding, and point-surface gap between the inclusive-down and differentiated embedding. They intensify the balancing, transitional and partial problems in the implementation of grassroots policies. The policy gap is the result of the “high-level formulation and low-level implementation” policy structure and the “decision-making reduction and implementation consultation” policy process. It is the space-time gap in the connection between the logic of the bureaucratic system from top to bottom and the logic of social context from the inside out. Grassroots policy implementation in the context of policy gaps should pay attention to two misunderstandings of perfectionism and systemic inefficiency, and adopt active response strategies of maximum reduction and gradual adjustment.

Key words: policy implementation; policy gap; strip and piece; educational resources; school place allocation

中图分类号: