东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 15-22.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2024.05.003

• 科技哲学研究 • 上一篇    

人工智能体的负责困境及其关系式出路新解

王乐   

  1. (东南大学人文学院,江苏南京211189)
  • 发布日期:2024-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 王乐
  • 作者简介:王乐(1996-),女,山东潍坊人,东南大学博士研究生,主要从事人工智能伦理、医学伦理研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(20&ZD040);江苏省研究生科研创新资助项目(KYCX22_0308)。

New Interpretation of the Responsibility Dilemma of Artificial Intelligence Agent and Its Relationship Solution

WANG Le   

  1. (School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
  • Published:2024-10-10
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 人工智能体运用于社会生活领域产生了责任鸿沟的问题,一些学者提出建构复合责任实体对智能体行为负责。实体是由多成员构成的,分布式的代理意味着分布式的责任,智能体能否像其他成员一样负责变得至关重要。按照传统的责任范式,人工智能体不具备责任主体的属性。关系主义提供了新的责任范式,在人机交互的关系模式中,受动者可以根据智能体的行动表现赋予其准责任归属主体的地位;但负责的关键不仅在于智能体的主观体验,更在于实际的权责平衡,“虚拟惩罚”不足以使智能体获得准责任承担主体的地位。必须超越虚拟惩罚,通过“补偿受动者”等方式使智能体真实地承担责任。

关键词: 复合责任实体; 准责任主体; 负责困境; 能动性; 补偿能力

Abstract: The application of AI in the field of social life has generated the problem of responsibility gaps. Some scholars propose constructing a compound responsibility entity to be responsible for the behavior of the agent. Entity is composed of multiple members, distributed agent means distributed responsibility, and whether the agent can be as responsible as other members becomes critical. According to the traditional responsibility paradigm, AI does not have the attribute of a responsibility subject. The relational doctrine provides a new responsibility paradigm in that in the human-computer interaction relationship model, the affected party can assign the status of quasi-responsibility subjects to the agent based on its action performance. However, the key to responsibility lies not only in the subjective experience of the agent, but also in the actual balance of rights and responsibilities. “Virtual punishment” is not enough to make the agent obtain the status of quasi-responsible subjects. It is necessary to go beyond virtual punishment and make the agent take responsibility in reality by means of “compensating the affected party”.

Key words: compound responsibility entity; quasi-responsible subject; responsibility dilemma; initiative; compensating capacity

中图分类号: