东北大学学报（社会科学版）

东北大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 18-25.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2025.01.003

• 科技伦理与哲学思辨 • 上一篇    下一篇

诠释学视域下技术人工物结构—功能关系研究

吴国林1，2， 马 肖2   

  1. （1.华南理工大学 哲学与科技高等研究所, 广东 广州 510640； 2.华南理工大学 马克思主义学院， 广东 广州 510640）
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-26 修回日期:2024-01-26 接受日期:2024-01-26 发布日期:2025-02-10
  • 通讯作者: -
  • 作者简介:吴国林，华南理工大学教授，博士生导师； 马 肖，华南理工大学博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA038)；中宣部文化名家暨“四个一批”人才项目(x2sxN2200060)。

Study on the StructureFunction Relationship of Technological Artifacts from the Perspective of Hermeneutics

WU Guolin1,2, MA Xiao2   

  1. (1. Institute of Advanced Studies in Philosophy and Science and Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China； 2. School of Marxism, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)
  • Received:2024-01-26 Revised:2024-01-26 Accepted:2024-01-26 Published:2025-02-10
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

8

摘要： 自荷兰学者克劳斯提出技术人工物结构—功能关系的“逻辑鸿沟”问题以来，学者们试图从逻辑关系、认识论和本体论等视域来跨越鸿沟，但都未能建立起技术人工物结构—功能之间的因果性关系。根据海德格尔理解与存在同一的思想，人作为结构与功能相互指向的中间载体是不可或缺的，所以技术人工物结构—功能是一种诠释学的关系。诠释学的完整内涵要以阐释、应用和说明形成统一体。在诠释学内涵的基础上，揭示了技术人工物结构—功能之间的诠释过程，为跨越技术人工物结构—功能关系的“逻辑鸿沟”问题提出了新的视角。

关键词: 技术人工物； 结构； 功能； 诠释学； 因果性

Abstract: Since Kroes, a Dutch scholar, put forward the problem of “logical gap” between the structure and function of technological artifacts, scholars have tried to bridge the gap from the perspectives of logical relationship, epistemology and ontology, but have failed to establish the causal relationship between the structure and function of technological artifacts. According to Heideggers idea that understanding and existence are the same, humans, as intermediate carriers where structure and function point to each other, are indispensable. Therefore, the structurefunction of technological artifacts is a hermeneutic relationship. The complete connotation of hermeneutics should be unified by interpretation, application and explanation. Based on the connotation of hermeneutics, this paper reveals the interpretation process between the structure and function of technological artifacts. To bridge the “logical gap” between the structure and function of technological artifacts, a new perspective is proposed.

Key words: technological artifacts; structure; function; hermeneutics; causality

中图分类号: