东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 99-107.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2025.01.011

• 政治与公共管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

基层政府环境政策执行的基本类型与生成逻辑 -基于注意力分配理论的多案例考察

张玉强1, 董 琳2   

  1. (1.云南大学 政府管理学院, 云南 昆明 650500;2.东北大学 文法学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110169)
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-10 修回日期:2023-10-10 接受日期:2023-10-10 发布日期:2025-02-10
  • 通讯作者: -
  • 作者简介:张玉强,云南大学讲师,管理学博士; 董 琳,东北大学博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金(22FZXB071); 山西省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究项目(2022J002)。国家社会科学基金青年项目(24CZZ068); 云南省哲学社会科学基金青年项目(QN202312);云南大学人文社会科学研究基金项目(2023YNUGSP44)。

Basic Types and Generative Logic of Grassroots Governments Environmental Policy Implementation: A Multicase Study Based on Attention Allocation Theory

ZHANG Yuqiang1, DONG Lin2   

  1. (1. School of Government, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China; 2. School of Humanities & Law, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China)
  • Received:2023-10-10 Revised:2023-10-10 Accepted:2023-10-10 Published:2025-02-10
  • Contact: -
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要: 在多任务、多目标治理情境下,基层政府环境政策总体上呈现“调适性执行”的特征。基于注意力分配理论,构建起“组织使命—环境认同”的理论分析框架,并通过多案例研究方法对基层政府环境政策执行类型及内在逻辑进行了实证研究。研究发现,组织使命与环境认同双重维度的叠加组合形塑出互益型、选择型、倡议型和渐进型四种差异化的环境政策执行类型,以调适性、灵活性的适应性治理策略应对上级要求和民众诉求的双重压力。注意力超载下的组织使命逻辑以双轨机制和身份调适机制应对任务压力,环保达标竞赛中的环境认同逻辑则以本土话语机制和主体关联机制构建政策共同体以回应民众诉求,二者共同构成基层环境政策“调适性执行”的生成逻辑。这一发现在理论上为基层环境政策执行提供了新视角,也展现了基层政府在组织使命和环境认同之间策略性执行环境政策的丰富图景。

关键词: 政策执行; 环境政策; 注意力分配; 环境治理; 类型学

Abstract: In the context of multitask and multiobjective governance,grassroots governments generally exhibit a characteristic of “adaptive implementation” in their environmental policies. Based on attention allocation theory, this paper builds up an analytical framework of “organizational missionenvironmental identity”. Through a multicase study approach, an empirical study was conducted on the types and underlying logic of grassroots governments environmental policy implementation. It is found in the study that the combination of the dual dimensions of organizational mission and environmental identity has shaped four differentiated types of environmental policy implementation: mutually beneficial type, selective type, initiative type, and incremental type. These types respond to the dual pressures of higherlevel requirements and public demands through adaptive and resilient strategies. Under attention overload, the organizational mission logic employs dualtrack mechanisms and identity adjustment mechanisms to cope with task pressures, while the environmental identity logic in the race to meet environmental standards constructs policy communities through local discourse mechanisms and subjectrelated mechanisms. This is the generative logic of “adaptive implementation”. Theoretically, this finding provides a new perspective on grassroots environmental policy implementation, and it also provides a vivid illustration of the strategic approaches employed by grassroots governments in implementing environmental policies, navigating the interplay between organizational mission and environmental identity.

Key words: policy implementation; environmental policy; attention allocation; environmental governance; typology

中图分类号: