东北大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 31-37.DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2026.01.004

• 科技伦理与哲学思辨 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国古代工程活动中工匠责任探析

杨司阳, 王健   

  1. 东北大学 马克思主义学院,辽宁 沈阳 110169
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-23 出版日期:2026-01-25 发布日期:2026-01-27
  • 作者简介:杨司阳,东北大学博士研究生
    王 健,东北大学教授,博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目(24&ZD173)

Analysis of Craftsmen’s Responsibility in Ancient Chinese Engineering Activities

Siyang YANG, Jian WANG   

  1. School of Marxism,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China
  • Received:2024-03-23 Online:2026-01-25 Published:2026-01-27

摘要:

责任问题在当代工程活动中至关重要。工匠责任作为中国古代工程实践的核心机制,在质量保障、技艺传承等多方面发挥着关键作用,其丰富内涵是理解中华传统工程文明独特逻辑的重要切入点。通过对《考工记》《营造法式》等典籍的系统梳理,提炼出工匠责任的主要表征,包括天人合一的“工以载道”、依从法仪的“遵循度程”、技艺传承的“师徒相承”、考责其诚的“物勒工名”、监督赏罚的“工师效功”以及保证修缮的“岁修穿淘”。这些表征为构建当代工匠尽责、守责、承责、定责、督责、负责的完整责任体系提供了有力支撑,对破解当代工程活动中主体伦理缺位、技术标准离散、质量追溯困难、全周期运维薄弱等难题具有启示意义。

关键词: 古代工程, 工匠, 责任, 工匠责任, 工程伦理

Abstract:

The issue of responsibility is of paramount importance in contemporary engineering activities. Craftsmen’s responsibility, as a core mechanism in ancient Chinese engineering practice, played a crucial role in ensuring quality, transmitting technical skills, and other key aspects. Its rich connotations provide an essential perspective for understanding the unique logic of traditional Chinese engineering civilization. Through a systematic analysis of classical texts such as The ArtificersRecordKao Gong Ji) and Treatise on Architectural Methods (Yingzao Fashi), this study identifies the principal manifestations of craftsmen’s responsibility. These include: “craftsmanship as a vehicle of the Dao”, embodying the harmony between humanity and nature; “adherence to standards and procedures”, following established norms and measurements; “master-apprentice transmission”, ensuring the continuity of craftsmanship through mentorship; “inscribing the craftsman’s name on the artifact”, holding artisans accountable by marking their names on their work; “evaluation and merit-based rewards/punishments by master craftsmen”, assessing performance through supervision and incentives; and “annual maintenance and dredging”, guaranteeing long-term functionality through regular upkeep. These manifestations provide strong support for constructing a comprehensive contemporary responsibility system for craftsmen, encompassing the dimensions of fulfilling responsibility, upholding responsibility, inheriting responsibility, defining responsibility, supervising responsibility, and assuming responsibility. It offers insights for addressing such challenges in contemporary engineering activities as the lack of subject ethics, fragmented technical standards, difficulties in quality traceability, and weak whole-life-cycle operation and maintenance.

Key words: ancient engineering, craftsmen, responsibility, craftsmen’s responsibility, engineering ethics

中图分类号: